|
“Ideally, more space should be allocated to the pedestrians, particularly on these crowded thoroughfares in the historic district. We hope this would continue to be studied and to be implemented at the next available opportunity.”
“I really think, at this point in time, it is a waste of $10 or $15 million dollars to do this project. I really think (that) five years from now, with the way Georgetown is being improved commercially and the re-birth of the commercial area, we are going to go back and say this was not a sufficient and incremental improvement in the pedestrian experience to have spent that much money on. “I respectfully and regrettably say, for all this excellent work we are doing – if we don’t widen the sidewalks, it’s a waste of money. “I’m saying why would you come back later and do the study rather than put this $10 million dollar expenditure on hold?”
“One key focus of this work [August 29, 2001 Gorove/Slade Associates traffic study] was on traffic operations on M Street. The conclusion of that work was that the vehicle traffic and parking lanes can be reduced from six to five, and the sidewalks can be widened from eleven feet to sixteen feet through most of Georgetown… Another benefit of this proposal is that it would maintain the capacity of M Street to move vehicular traffic while increasing the capacity of the street to move pedestrians.”
|